# Qwen3.7 Max vs Wizardlm 13b

> Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-7-max-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Max scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 65.0 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 51.5 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 42 | 274 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $7.50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1498 | 1035 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1515 | — |
| SciCode | 48.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,189 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 0.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)
- Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1483 | 1018 |
| SimpleBench | 70.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 85.1% | — |
| CritPt | 13.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 19% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 9.5% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | — |
| DTBench | 92.3% | — |
| LMCA | 44% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.68 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1490 | 1017 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 64.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 34.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 55.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1488 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1530 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1484 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1048 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1476 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1449 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1481 | 1047 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1110 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.7 Max better than Wizardlm 13b?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen3.7 Max or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Max and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Max has 33 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.