# Qwen3.7 Max vs Step 3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.7 Flash costs 9.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-7-max-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Max scores higher in 3 categories and Step 3.7 Flash in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 49.2 to 21.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 85.1% for Qwen3.7 Max and 39.7% for Step 3.7 Flash.
- Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.18 / $1.11 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Qwen3.7 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.
- Step 3.7 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.7 Max | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 51.5 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 42 | 207 |
| Context | 1M | 256K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | $7.50 | $1.11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 48.8% | 40% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,189 | 694.12 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1515 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1498 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 0.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 85.1% | 39.7% |
| CritPt | 13.4% | 2.3% |
| SimpleBench | 70.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 19% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 9.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1483 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | — |
| DTBench | 92.3% | — |
| LMCA | 44% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.68 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 64.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 34.1% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1490 | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 55.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1488 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1530 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1484 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1449 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1110 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1481 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.7 Max better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.7 Flash costs 9.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Max or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $1.11 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.

### Is Qwen3.7 Max or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Max does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Max and Step 3.7 Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Max has 33 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.