# Qwen3.7 Max vs Sonar

> Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index. Sonar costs 3.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-7-max-vs-sonar
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 62.3 to 31.3.
- Sonar is cheaper at $1 / $1 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Qwen3.7 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Perplexity |
| Noometry Index | 51.4 | 37.8 |
| Rank | 35 | 184 |
| Context | 1M | 128K |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | $1 |
| Output $/M | $7.50 | $1 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)
- Sonar: 35.1 (#217)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1515 | — |
| SciCode | 48.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 35.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1498 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,189 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)
- Sonar: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 0.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)
- Sonar: 20.3 (#221)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 70.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 85.1% | — |
| CritPt | 13.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 19% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 9.5% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1483 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | — |
| DTBench | 92.3% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 37.9% |
| LMCA | 44% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.74 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 46.9% |

## Math

- Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)
- Sonar: 31.3 (#197)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 64.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 34.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 41.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1488 | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)
- Sonar: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 55.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1488 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)
- Sonar: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1475 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1533 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1482 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)
- Sonar: 71.5 (#146)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 76.2% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)
- Sonar: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1484 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)
- Sonar: 52.6 (#166)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1450 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1110 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1482 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.1% |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.7 Max better than Sonar?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index. Sonar costs 3.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Max or Sonar?

Sonar is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $1 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.

### Is Qwen3.7 Max or Sonar better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.2 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Max does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Max and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Max has 33 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.