# Qwen3.7 Flash vs Ring-2.6-1T

> Qwen3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#152); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-7-flash-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.7 Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 36.3 |
| Rank | 152 | — |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.03 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3.7 Flash: —
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 43.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 23% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 15% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.62 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 19.3% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 82.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.7 Flash better than Ring-2.6-1T?

Qwen3.7 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#152); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Flash and Ring-2.6-1T share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Flash has 7 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.