# Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3 Max

> Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 44× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-7-flash-vs-qwen3-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Flash scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Max in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 27.3 to 22.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 23% for Qwen3.7 Flash and 4% for Qwen3 Max.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $6 for Qwen3 Max.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 43.5 |
| Rank | 152 | 82 |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.03 | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | $0.13 | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen3.7 Flash: —
- Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3.7 Flash: —
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)
- Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 43.8% | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 23% | 4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 15% | 5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.62 | 142.41 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1448 |
| DTBench | — | 82.1% |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |

## Math

- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)
- Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 19.3% | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.7% | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1447 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)
- Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 82.3% | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1457 |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3.7 Flash: —
- Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1479 |
| LMArena French | — | 1450 |
| LMArena German | — | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1463 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3.7 Flash: —
- Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1420 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3.7 Flash: —
- Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1439 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.7 Flash: —
- Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.7 Flash better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 44× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Flash or Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Max lists at $1.20 and $6.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Flash and Qwen3 Max share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Flash has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.
