# Qwen3.7 Flash vs Qwen3.7 Max

> Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 68× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-7-flash-vs-qwen3-7-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Flash scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 62.4 to 38.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 19.3% for Qwen3.7 Flash and 64.6% for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.9 | 51.5 |
| Rank | 156 | 42 |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.03 | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | $0.13 | $7.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen3.7 Flash: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1515 |
| SciCode | — | 48.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1498 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3.7 Flash: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 43.8% | 85.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 23% | 19% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 15% | 32% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.64 | 153.68 |
| SimpleBench | — | 70.4% |
| CritPt | — | 13.4% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1483 |
| DTBench | — | 92.3% |
| LMCA | — | 44% |

## Math

- Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 19.3% | 64.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.7% | 95.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 34.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1490 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 82.3% | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 55.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1488 |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3.7 Flash: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1530 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1484 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3.7 Flash: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1460 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3.7 Flash: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1482 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.7 Flash: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Flash | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1449 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1481 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.7 Flash better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 68× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Flash or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Flash and Qwen3.7 Max share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Flash has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.