# Qwen3.6 Plus vs Yi-Lightning

> Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-6-plus-vs-yi-lightning
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-Lightning in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 56.1 to 34.8.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.6 Plus | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 47.3 | 36.5 |
| Rank | 54 | 206 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $3 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.6 (#125)
- Yi-Lightning: 27.0 (#315)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | 1313 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 12.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1461 | — |
| SciCode | 40.7% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 670.15 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3.6 Plus: —
- Yi-Lightning: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,115 | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 28.5 (#89)
- Yi-Lightning: 24.9 (#137)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1449 | 1302 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.3% | — |
| CritPt | 2.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 17% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 59.5% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 12% | — |
| DTBench | 81.9% | — |
| LMCA | 33.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 147.67 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 50.6 (#44)
- Yi-Lightning: 33.5 (#173)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1300 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 38.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 93.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 26.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 8.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#40)
- Yi-Lightning: 34.8 (#182)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1456 | 1286 |
| GPQA Diamond | 88.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 44.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.5 (#66)
- Yi-Lightning: 42.4 (#191)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1424 | 1269 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1478 | 1320 |
| LMArena French | 1454 | 1304 |
| LMArena German | 1451 | 1267 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1389 | 1228 |
| LMArena Korean | 1381 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1255 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1432 | 1315 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.2 (#70)
- Yi-Lightning: 67.6 (#191)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1425 | 1278 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.1 (#48)
- Yi-Lightning: 39.4 (#176)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1440 | 1297 |
| CL-bench | 20.3% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.4 (#78)
- Yi-Lightning: 50.4 (#178)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1302 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1405 | 1280 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1438 | 1311 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.6 Plus better than Yi-Lightning?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen3.6 Plus or Yi-Lightning better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 27.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Plus and Yi-Lightning share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Plus has 37 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Lightning has 18.