# Qwen3.6 Plus vs Wizardlm 70b

> Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-6-plus-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 62.2 to 34.8.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.6 Plus | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 47.5 | 33.0 |
| Rank | 62 | 249 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $3 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)
- Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | 1081 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.9% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1461 | — |
| SciCode | 40.7% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 670.15 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3.6 Plus: —
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,115 | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)
- Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1449 | 1079 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.3% | — |
| CritPt | 2.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 17% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 59.5% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 12% | — |
| DTBench | 81.9% | — |
| LMCA | 33.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 147.65 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)
- Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1116 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 38.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 93.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 26.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 8.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 44.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1424 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1477 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1452 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1379 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1432 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1425 | 1093 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | 1097 |
| CL-bench | 20.3% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1404 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1438 | 1108 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.6 Plus better than Wizardlm 70b?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen3.6 Plus or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Plus and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Plus has 37 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.