# Qwen3.6 Plus vs Step 3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.7 Flash costs 2.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-6-plus-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher in 3 categories and Step 3.7 Flash in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 51.8 to 42.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 60.3% for Qwen3.6 Plus and 39.7% for Step 3.7 Flash.
- Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.18 / $1.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Qwen3.6 Plus.
- Qwen3.6 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.
- Step 3.7 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.6 Plus | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 47.5 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 62 | 207 |
| Context | 1M | 256K |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | $3 | $1.11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 40.7% | 40% |
| ALE-Bench | 670.15 | 694.12 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.9% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1461 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3.6 Plus: —
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,115 | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.3% | 39.7% |
| CritPt | 2.9% | 2.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 17% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 59.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1449 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 12% | — |
| DTBench | 81.9% | — |
| LMCA | 33.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 147.65 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 38.2% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 93.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1450 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 26.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 8.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 44.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1424 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1477 | — |
| LMArena French | 1455 | — |
| LMArena German | 1452 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1379 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1432 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1425 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 20.3% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1438 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.6 Plus better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.7 Flash costs 2.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 Plus or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $1.11 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Plus lists at $0.50 and $3.

### Is Qwen3.6 Plus or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.8 vs 40.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Plus and Step 3.7 Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Plus has 37 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.