# Qwen3.6 Plus vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-6-plus-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 28

## Summary

- They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 39.3 to 29.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 60.3% for Qwen3.6 Plus and 74.8% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Qwen3.6 Plus.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.6 Plus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 47.5 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 62 | 72 |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $3 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 40.7% | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1467 | 1473 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.9% | — |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1461 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 670.15 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3.6 Plus: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,115 | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.3% | 74.8% |
| CritPt | 2.9% | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 17% | 24% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1449 | 1460 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 12% | 17% |
| DTBench | 81.9% | 84% |
| LMCA | 33.1% | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 147.65 | 147.37 |
| Thematic Generalization | 59.5% | — |

## Math

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 38.2% | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 93.3% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1450 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 26.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 8.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88.4% | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | 1467 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 44.1% | — |

## Multimodal

- Qwen3.6 Plus: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1424 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1477 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1455 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1452 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1389 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1379 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1432 | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1425 | 1440 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | 20.3% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 Plus | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1404 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1438 | 1460 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.6 Plus better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 Plus or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Plus lists at $0.50 and $3.

### Is Qwen3.6 Plus or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Plus and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

28 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Plus has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.