# Qwen3.6 27B vs Wizardlm 13b

> Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-6-27b-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 50.3 to 30.5.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.6 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.2 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 117 | 274 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | — |
| Output $/M | $3.60 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3.6 27B: 39.1 (#163)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 37.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.6 27B: 25.0 (#153)
- Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| DTBench | 78.1% | — |
| LMCA | 34.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.5 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3.6 27B: 48.5 (#62)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 35.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 91.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#63)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3.6 27B: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3.6 27B: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1048 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3.6 27B: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#181)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1026 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.6 27B better than Wizardlm 13b?

Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen3.6 27B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Qwen3.6 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 27B and Wizardlm 13b share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 27B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.
