# Qwen3.6 27B vs Step 3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.7 Flash costs 3.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 27B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-6-27b-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.6 27B scores higher in 2 categories and Step 3.7 Flash in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 47.5 to 40.9.
- Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.18 / $1.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $3.60 for Qwen3.6 27B.
- Qwen3.6 27B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.6 27B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 36.5 |
| Rank | 112 | 207 |
| Context | 262K | 256K |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | $3.60 | $1.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3.6 27B: 38.5 (#162)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 39.4 (#147)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 37.3% | 40% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.6 27B: 24.4 (#148)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 20.9 (#211)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.9% | 2.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| DTBench | 78.1% | — |
| LMCA | 34.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.47 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3.6 27B: 47.5 (#56)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 40.9 (#74)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 35.1% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 91.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#58)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#180)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1026 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.6 27B better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.7 Flash costs 3.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 27B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 27B or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $1.11 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 27B lists at $0.60 and $3.60.

### Is Qwen3.6 27B or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.5 vs 39.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 27B does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 27B and Step 3.7 Flash share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 27B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.