# Qwen3.6 27B vs Step 3.5 Flash

> Qwen3.6 27B and Step 3.5 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.9 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-6-27b-vs-step-3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 52.4 to 39.0.
- Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $3.60 for Qwen3.6 27B.
- Qwen3.6 27B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.6 27B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 41.7 |
| Rank | 112 | 116 |
| Context | 262K | 256K |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | $3.60 | $0.30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3.6 27B: 38.5 (#162)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 41.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 37.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1436 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.6 27B: 24.4 (#148)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 21.2 (#202)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 28.4% |
| CritPt | 0.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1411 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| DTBench | 78.1% | — |
| LMCA | 34.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.47 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3.6 27B: 47.5 (#56)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 40.6 (#77)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 35.1% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 66.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 91.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1408 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#58)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 39.0 (#127)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1422 |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3.6 27B: —
- Step 3.5 Flash: 50.7 (#115)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1448 |
| LMArena French | — | 1421 |
| LMArena German | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1353 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1385 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1419 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3.6 27B: —
- Step 3.5 Flash: 73.3 (#119)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1385 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3.6 27B: —
- Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#112)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1402 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#180)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 59.0 (#108)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1403 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1357 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1026 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1405 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.6 27B better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Qwen3.6 27B and Step 3.5 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.9 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 27B or Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 27B lists at $0.60 and $3.60.

### Is Qwen3.6 27B or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.7 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 27B does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 27B and Step 3.5 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 27B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.