# Qwen3.6 27B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 4.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 27B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-6-27b-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.6 27B scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $3.60 for Qwen3.6 27B.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.6 27B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 33.8 |
| Rank | 112 | 229 |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $3.60 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3.6 27B: 38.5 (#162)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 37.3% | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.6 27B: 24.4 (#148)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.9% | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| DTBench | 78.1% | — |
| LMCA | 34.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.47 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3.6 27B: 47.5 (#56)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 35.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 91.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#58)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 85.9% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#180)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.6 27B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1026 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.6 27B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 4.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 27B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 27B or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 27B lists at $0.60 and $3.60.

### Is Qwen3.6 27B or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Qwen3.6 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 27B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.6 27B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.