# Qwen3.5 Plus vs Wizardlm 13b

> Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-5-plus-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 47.9 to 27.8.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.3 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 103 | 272 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.40 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3.5 Plus: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |
| ALE-Bench | 621.92 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3.5 Plus: —
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 0.54 | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 17% | — |
| DTBench | 80.5% | — |
| LMCA | 36.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.79 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 21% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 84.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 25.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3.5 Plus: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3.5 Plus: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1049 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 19.8% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 12.4% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.5 Plus: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.5 Plus better than Wizardlm 13b?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 Plus and Wizardlm 13b share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 Plus has 15 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.