# Qwen3.5-Flash vs Wizardlm 13b

> Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-5-flash-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.5-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 58.2 to 30.7.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.3 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 105 | 272 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.10 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.9 (#234)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1412 | 1035 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1243 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 221.8 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3.5-Flash: —
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 462.69 | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.5-Flash: 32.9 (#63)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1404 | 1018 |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 20% | — |
| DTBench | 82.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.98 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3.5-Flash: 36.3 (#117)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1407 | 1017 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 18.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 6.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#84)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 82.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 20.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.7 (#116)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1385 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1446 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1412 | — |
| LMArena German | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1369 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1344 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1379 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1399 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.8 (#133)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1049 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#119)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1392 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.5-Flash: 58.2 (#117)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1343 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.5-Flash better than Wizardlm 13b?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen3.5-Flash or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Qwen3.5-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.9 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5-Flash and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5-Flash has 32 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.