# Qwen3.5 397B-A17B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 4.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 397B-A17B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-5-397b-a17b-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads 34.5 to 22.4.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $3.60 for Qwen3.5 397B-A17B.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.0 | 34.3 |
| Rank | 67 | 232 |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.60 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $3.60 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 42.0 (#114)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1400 | — |
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1465 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 33.3 (#53)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 24.9% | — |
| τ²-bench Airline | 81.5% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 9.8% | — |
| τ²-bench Retail | 84.4% | — |
| τ²-bench Telecom | 97.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 34.5 (#70)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 73.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 58.9% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 13% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 65.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 18% | — |
| DTBench | 87.5% | — |
| LMCA | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.65 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 46.1 (#73)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 31.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1454 | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 53.3 (#58)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 86.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1462 | — |

## Multimodal

- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 40.7 (#44)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1263 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 53.7 (#59)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1430 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1500 | — |
| LMArena French | 1461 | — |
| LMArena German | 1447 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1429 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1441 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 75.0 (#77)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1424 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 44.1 (#74)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 62.3 (#79)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1438 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1478 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1446 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.5 397B-A17B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 4.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 397B-A17B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 397B-A17B lists at $0.60 and $3.60.

### Is Qwen3.5 397B-A17B or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.0 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 397B-A17B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 397B-A17B has 36 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.