# Qwen3.5 35B-A3B vs Wizardlm 70b

> Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-5-35b-a3b-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads 57.9 to 34.8.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.0 | 33.0 |
| Rank | 123 | 249 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $2 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.8 (#251)
- Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1410 | 1081 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1254 | — |
| SciCode | 29.3% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 24.6 (#161)
- Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1400 | 1079 |
| CritPt | 0.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 10% | — |
| DTBench | 80% | — |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.52 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 39.9 (#97)
- Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | 1116 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 56% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 70% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.8 (#79)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.0 (#127)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1378 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1367 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1376 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1356 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1392 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 72.8 (#128)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1379 | 1093 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#127)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1389 | 1097 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 57.9 (#124)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1395 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1346 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1390 | 1108 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better than Wizardlm 70b?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen3.5 35B-A3B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 35B-A3B and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.