# Qwen3-4B vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-4b-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen3-4B scores higher in 1 category and Trinity Large Thinking in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Trinity Large Thinking leads 37.6 to 29.7.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3-4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 264 | 185 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3-4B: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1381 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)
- Trinity Large Thinking: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 35.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1350 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 38.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 52.2% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.7% | 6.9% |
| GPQA Diamond | 52.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1360 |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3-4B: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1373 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1357 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3-4B: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3-4B: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3-4B: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3-4B better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3-4B and Trinity Large Thinking share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen3-4B has 6 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.