# Qwen3 32B vs Wizardlm 70b

> Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-32b-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3 32B scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 32B leads 52.9 to 34.8.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3 32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | 33.0 |
| Rank | 172 | 249 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.70 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.80 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)
- Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1358 | 1081 |
| Aider Polyglot | 40% | — |
| SciCode | 35.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 48.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)
- Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | 1079 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 54.9% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| DTBench | 67.5% | — |
| LMCA | 17.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.51 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)
- Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1399 | 1116 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1362 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1317 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1357 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1155 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1093 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1327 | 1097 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 74.2% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1331 | 1108 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3 32B better than Wizardlm 70b?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen3 32B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Qwen3 32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3 32B and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3 32B has 26 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.