# Qwen3 32B vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Qwen3 32B and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.2 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-32b-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3 32B scores higher in 4 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 32B leads 37.7 to 34.1.
- Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen3 32B.
- Trinity Large Thinking accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3 32B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 172 | 185 |
| Context | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.70 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $2.80 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 35.4% | 36.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1358 | 1381 |
| Aider Polyglot | 40% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)
- Trinity Large Thinking: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 48.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.3% | 0.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1334 | 1350 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 54.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| DTBench | 67.5% | — |
| LMCA | 17.3% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.51 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1399 | 1366 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.9% | 6.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1362 | 1360 |
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1317 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1357 | 1373 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1356 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1337 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1357 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1327 | 1355 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 74.2% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1331 | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3 32B better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Qwen3 32B and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.2 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen3 32B or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Qwen3 32B lists at $0.70 and $2.80.

### Is Qwen3 32B or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Qwen3 32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Trinity Large Thinking does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3 32B and Trinity Large Thinking share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3 32B has 26 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.