# Qwen3 32B vs QwQ-32B

> Qwen3 32B and QwQ-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-32b-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3 32B scores higher in 5 categories and QwQ-32B in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where QwQ-32B leads 49.0 to 43.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 40% for Qwen3 32B and 20.9% for QwQ-32B.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3 32B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 166 | 153 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.70 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.80 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)
- QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 40% | 20.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1358 | 1333 |
| SciCode | 35.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)
- QwQ-32B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 48.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)
- QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1335 | 1326 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.51 | 137.6 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 54.9% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| DTBench | 67.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| LMCA | 17.3% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |

## Math

- Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)
- QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.9% | 59.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1399 | 1359 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 65.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1362 | 1323 |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)
- QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1317 | 1306 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1357 | 1378 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1297 |
| LMArena French | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1353 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)
- QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 74.2% | 83.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1327 | 1308 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)
- QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1331 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3 32B better than QwQ-32B?

Qwen3 32B and QwQ-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Qwen3 32B or QwQ-32B better for coding?

Qwen3 32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3 32B and QwQ-32B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3 32B has 26 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.