# Qwen3 32B vs Qwen3-4B

> Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-32b-vs-qwen3-4b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3 32B scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3-4B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 32B leads 37.9 to 28.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 66.9% for Qwen3 32B and 52.2% for Qwen3-4B.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3 32B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 31.5 |
| Rank | 166 | 261 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.70 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.80 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 40% | — |
| SciCode | 35.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1358 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)
- Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 48.7% | 35.7% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)
- Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | 4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 54.9% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1335 | — |
| DTBench | 67.5% | — |
| LMCA | 17.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.51 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)
- Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.9% | 52.2% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1399 | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)
- Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.7% | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.9% | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1362 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1317 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1357 | — |
| LMArena German | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 74.2% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1327 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 32B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1331 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3 32B better than Qwen3-4B?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3 32B and Qwen3-4B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3 32B has 26 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.