# Qwen3-30B-A3B vs Wizardlm 13b

> Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-30b-a3b-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3-30B-A3B scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-30B-A3B leads 55.9 to 30.7.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 38.5 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 174 | 272 |
| Context | 41K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.12 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.50 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.0 (#188)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | 1035 |
| SciCode | 33.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 29.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.5 (#75)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 41.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 21.6 (#193)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1398 | 1018 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 54.9% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 8% | — |
| DTBench | 69.3% | — |
| LMCA | 22.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 139.63 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 36.0 (#133)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1394 | 1017 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 47.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 70.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.7 (#96)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 70.1% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.8 (#126)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1434 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1419 | — |
| LMArena German | 1379 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1338 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1369 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1403 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.2 (#137)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1364 | 1049 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#278)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1379 | 1054 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 40.6% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.9 (#138)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1384 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1378 | 1047 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 75.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3-30B-A3B better than Wizardlm 13b?

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen3-30B-A3B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Qwen3-30B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3-30B-A3B and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.