# Qwen3-30B-A3B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-30b-a3b-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3-30B-A3B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Coder Next in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- Qwen3-30B-A3B is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.12 / $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 41K.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.5 | 33.8 |
| Rank | 174 | 229 |
| Context | 41K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.12 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $0.50 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.0 (#188)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 33.3% | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | 29.8% | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1416 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.5 (#75)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 41.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 21.6 (#193)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.3% | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 54.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1398 | — |
| DTBench | 69.3% | — |
| LMCA | 22.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 139.63 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 36.0 (#133)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 47.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 70.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1394 | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.7 (#96)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 70.1% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.8 (#126)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1434 | — |
| LMArena French | 1419 | — |
| LMArena German | 1379 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1338 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1369 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1403 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.2 (#137)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1364 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#278)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 40.6% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1379 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.9 (#138)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3-30B-A3B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1384 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1318 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 75.3% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1378 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3-30B-A3B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3-30B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen3-30B-A3B or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3-30B-A3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next lists at $0.12 and $0.80.

### Is Qwen3-30B-A3B or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Qwen3-30B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 41K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3-30B-A3B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.