# Qwen3 235B-A22B vs Ring-2.6-1T

> Qwen3 235B-A22B has enough public results to be ranked (#91); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-235b-a22b-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3 235B-A22B scores higher in 1 category and Ring-2.6-1T in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Ring-2.6-1T leads 26.1 to 15.7.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 91 | — |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.70 | — |
| Output $/M | $2.80 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3 235B-A22B: 44.3 (#75)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7

| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 42.4% | 42.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 59.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 41% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3 235B-A22B: 33.9 (#51)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 52.1% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | -11.34 | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3 235B-A22B: 15.7 (#311)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1

| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 3.7% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 69.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 11% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 12% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1433 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 9% | — |
| DTBench | 80.3% | — |
| LMCA | 29.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.85 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59.7 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3 235B-A22B: 50.4 (#57)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 71.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1432 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 68.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 8.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3 235B-A22B: 49.6 (#73)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 80.1% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 40.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 84.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 15.6% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 72.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1463 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3 235B-A22B: 52.3 (#89)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1409 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1481 | — |
| LMArena French | 1445 | — |
| LMArena German | 1433 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1430 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3 235B-A22B: 72.6 (#136)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 83.5% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1408 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen3 235B-A22B: 46.1 (#26)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 75% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1426 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3 235B-A22B: 59.6 (#108)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B-A22B | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1384 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1366 | — |
| WildBench | 86.6% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3 235B-A22B better than Ring-2.6-1T?

Qwen3 235B-A22B has enough public results to be ranked (#91); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is Qwen3 235B-A22B or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

Qwen3 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 40.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3 235B-A22B and Ring-2.6-1T share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3 235B-A22B has 49 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.
