# Qwen3 14B vs Wizardlm 70b

> Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-14b-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 14B leads 38.6 to 32.2.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.5 | 33.0 |
| Rank | 225 | 249 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.35 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)
- Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1081 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 41% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)
- Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 49.1% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1079 |
| DTBench | 64% | — |
| LMCA | 18.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.23 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)
- Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 63.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3 14B: —
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3 14B: —
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1093 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 62.5% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1097 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3 14B: —
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1108 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3 14B better than Wizardlm 70b?

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen3 14B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3 14B and Wizardlm 70b share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3 14B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.