# Qwen3 14B vs Wizardlm 13b

> Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-14b-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 14B leads 37.0 to 27.8.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.0 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 222 | 272 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.35 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 41% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 49.1% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |
| DTBench | 64% | — |
| LMCA | 18.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.23 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 63.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3 14B: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3 14B: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1049 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 62.5% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3 14B: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3 14B better than Wizardlm 13b?

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen3 14B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3 14B and Wizardlm 13b share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3 14B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.