# Qwen3 14B vs Solar Pro4

> Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-14b-vs-solar-pro4
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Solar Pro4 leads 28.5 to 18.5.
- Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $1.40 for Qwen3 14B.
- Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3 14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 35.5 | 42.1 |
| Rank | 225 | 121 |
| Context | 131K | 524K |
| Input $/M | $0.35 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $1.40 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)
- Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| SciCode | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1437 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)
- Solar Pro4: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 41% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)
- Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 49.1% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |
| DTBench | 64% | — |
| LMCA | 18.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.23 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)
- Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1416 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)
- Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 63.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1427 |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3 14B: —
- Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1415 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3 14B: —
- Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1377 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)
- Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 62.5% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1381 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3 14B: —
- Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1385 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3 14B better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen3 14B or Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3 14B lists at $0.35 and $1.40.

### Is Qwen3 14B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3 14B and Solar Pro4 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3 14B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.