# Qwen3 14B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 14B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-14b-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3 14B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Coder Next in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 21.7 to 18.1.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $1.40 for Qwen3 14B.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.0 | 33.8 |
| Rank | 222 | 229 |
| Context | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.35 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $1.40 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 31.6% | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 41% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 49.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | — |
| DTBench | 64% | — |
| LMCA | 18.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.23 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 63.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 62.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3 14B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 14B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen3 14B or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Qwen3 14B lists at $0.35 and $1.40.

### Is Qwen3 14B or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (36.7 vs 35.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3 14B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3 14B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.