# Qwen3 14B vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

> Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 14B costs 4.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-14b-vs-qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen3 14B scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 25.5 to 18.5.
- Qwen3 14B is cheaper at $0.35 / $1.40 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.5 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 225 | 190 |
| Context | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.35 | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | $1.40 | $7.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1275 |
| SciCode | 31.6% | — |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 41.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1412 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 461.45 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.44 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 41% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 49.1% | 49.5% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1372 |
| DTBench | 64% | — |
| LMCA | 18.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.23 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1365 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 63.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1338 |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3 14B: —
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1357 |
| LMArena French | — | 1398 |
| LMArena German | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1310 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1305 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1360 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3 14B: —
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1355 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 62.5% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1378 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3 14B: —
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

| Benchmark | Qwen3 14B | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1357 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1365 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3 14B better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 14B costs 4.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen3 14B or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3 14B is cheaper. It lists at $0.35 per million input tokens and $1.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

### Is Qwen3 14B or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3 14B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen3 14B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.