# Qwen3-1.7B vs Step 3.7 Flash

> Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-1-7b-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 40.9 to 15.4.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3-1.7B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 26.2 | 36.5 |
| Rank | 331 | 207 |
| Context | — | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3-1.7B: —
- Step 3.7 Flash: 39.4 (#147)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3-1.7B: 24.5 (#108)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 28.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3-1.7B: 18.5 (#263)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 20.9 (#211)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |

## Math

- Qwen3-1.7B: 15.4 (#288)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 40.9 (#74)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#273)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 38% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3-1.7B better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3-1.7B and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3-1.7B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.