# Qwen3-1.7B vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-1-7b-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3-1.7B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 19.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 8.1% for Qwen3-1.7B and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3-1.7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 26.6 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 336 | 72 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen3-1.7B: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1473 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 28.4% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 24% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1460 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |

## Math

- Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 8.1% | 93.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1466 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 38% | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1467 |

## Multimodal

- Qwen3-1.7B: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3-1.7B: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1510 |
| LMArena French | — | 1473 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3-1.7B: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1440 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3-1.7B: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3-1.7B: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-1.7B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1460 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3-1.7B better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3-1.7B and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3-1.7B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.