# Qwen2-72B vs Wizardlm 70b

> Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-72b-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2-72B scores higher in 5 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen2-72B leads 36.0 to 29.8.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 32.4 |
| Rank | 294 | 245 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)
- Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1196 | 1081 |
| WeirdML | 11.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 38.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 1.1% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)
- Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1079 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.27 | — |

## Math

- Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1235 | 1116 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 40.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1171 | — |
| MMLU | 82.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1176 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1240 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1151 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1169 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1169 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1111 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1168 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1181 | 1093 |

## Long Context

- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1193 | 1097 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1203 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1181 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1195 | 1108 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2-72B better than Wizardlm 70b?

Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen2-72B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Wizardlm 70b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.9 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2-72B and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2-72B has 26 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.