# Qwen2-72B vs Wizardlm 13b

> Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-72b-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2-72B scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2-72B leads 40.8 to 30.5.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 300 | 274 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1196 | 1035 |
| WeirdML | 11.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 38.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 1.1% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)
- Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1018 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.28 | — |

## Math

- Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1235 | 1017 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 40.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1171 | — |
| MMLU | 82.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1176 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1240 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1170 | — |
| LMArena German | 1151 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1111 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1169 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1169 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1181 | 1048 |

## Long Context

- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1192 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1203 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1181 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1196 | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2-72B better than Wizardlm 13b?

Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen2-72B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Wizardlm 13b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2-72B and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2-72B has 26 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.