# Qwen2-72B vs Step 3.7 Flash

> Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-72b-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 40.9 to 27.9.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 36.5 |
| Rank | 294 | 207 |
| Context | — | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 39.4 (#147)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| WeirdML | 11.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 38.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1196 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 1.1% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 20.9 (#211)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.27 | — |

## Math

- Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 40.9 (#74)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1235 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 40.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1171 | — |
| MMLU | 82.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1240 | — |
| LMArena French | 1169 | — |
| LMArena German | 1151 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1111 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1169 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1168 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1181 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1193 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1203 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1181 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1195 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2-72B better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen2-72B or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2-72B and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2-72B has 26 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.