# Qwen2-72B vs Solar Pro4

> Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-72b-vs-solar-pro4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2-72B scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Solar Pro4 leads 39.8 to 21.2.
- Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2-72B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 42.1 |
| Rank | 300 | 121 |
| Context | — | 524K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)
- Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1196 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| WeirdML | 11.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 38.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)
- Solar Pro4: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 1.1% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)
- Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1399 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.28 | — |

## Math

- Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)
- Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1235 | 1416 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)
- Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1171 | 1427 |
| GPQA Diamond | 40.8% | — |
| MMLU | 82.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)
- Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1176 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1240 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1170 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1151 | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1111 | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | 1083 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1169 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1169 | 1401 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)
- Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1181 | 1377 |

## Long Context

- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)
- Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1192 | 1381 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)
- Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1203 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1181 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1196 | 1385 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2-72B better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen2-72B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2-72B and Solar Pro4 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2-72B has 26 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.