# Qwen2-72B vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-72b-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2-72B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 21.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 40.8% for Qwen2-72B and 82.3% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 294 | 152 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 11.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 38.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1196 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 1.1% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.27 | 144.62 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |

## Math

- Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1235 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 40.8% | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1171 | — |
| MMLU | 82.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1240 | — |
| LMArena French | 1169 | — |
| LMArena German | 1151 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1111 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1169 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1168 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1181 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1193 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1203 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1181 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1195 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2-72B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2-72B and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2-72B has 26 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.