# Qwen2-72B vs Qwen3-4B

> Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-72b-vs-qwen3-4b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen2-72B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-4B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-4B leads 33.0 to 21.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 40.8% for Qwen2-72B and 52.3% for Qwen3-4B.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.5 | 31.5 |
| Rank | 294 | 261 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 11.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 38.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1196 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)
- Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.1% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 29.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)
- Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.27 | — |

## Math

- Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)
- Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1235 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)
- Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 40.8% | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1171 | — |
| MMLU | 82.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1240 | — |
| LMArena French | 1169 | — |
| LMArena German | 1151 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1111 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1169 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1168 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1181 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1193 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2-72B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1203 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1181 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1195 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2-72B better than Qwen3-4B?

Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2-72B and Qwen3-4B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen2-72B has 26 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.