# Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct vs Step 3

> Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-vl-72b-instruct-vs-step-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 3 leads 27.6 to 20.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 36% for Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct and 62.3% for Step 3.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 298 | 145 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $2.80 | — |
| Output $/M | $8.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
- Step 3: 39.5 (#144)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1367 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.4 (#136)
- Step 3: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | 5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.0 (#228)
- Step 3: 27.6 (#102)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 36% | 62.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1355 |

## Math

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
- Step 3: 34.9 (#148)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
- Step 3: 36.2 (#161)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1333 |

## Multimodal

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 32.9 (#92)
- Step 3: 34.9 (#81)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1107 | 1176 |
| Video-MME | 73.5% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
- Step 3: 46.5 (#154)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1271 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1372 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
- Step 3: 70.6 (#159)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1332 |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
- Step 3: 40.3 (#152)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1326 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
- Step 3: 54.5 (#146)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1322 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1340 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct and Step 3 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.