# Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct vs Solar Pro4

> Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-vl-72b-instruct-vs-solar-pro4
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Solar Pro4 leads 28.5 to 20.7.
- Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2.80 / $8.40 for Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct.
- Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 42.1 |
| Rank | 302 | 121 |
| Context | 131K | 524K |
| Input $/M | $2.80 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $8.40 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
- Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1437 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)
- Solar Pro4: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | 5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)
- Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 36% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |

## Math

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
- Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1416 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
- Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1427 |

## Multimodal

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)
- Solar Pro4: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1107 | — |
| Video-MME | 73.5% | — |
| GeoBench | 62% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
- Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1415 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
- Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1377 |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
- Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1381 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
- Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1385 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct or Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct lists at $2.80 and $8.40.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct and Solar Pro4 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.