# Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.1 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-plus-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher in 2 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 24.8 to 16.3.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.1 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 179 | 180 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 33.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1314 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1299 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.9 (#149)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1298 | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1289 | 1359 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.4 (#155)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1314 | 1372 |
| LMArena German | 1231 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1207 | 1312 |
| LMArena Russian | 1271 | 1338 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1356 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.2 (#139)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1292 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 54.0 (#152)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1299 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1262 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1299 | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.1 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.