# Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 vs Step 3

> Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-plus-vs-step-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 3 leads 54.5 to 49.5.
- Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 38.1 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 179 | 145 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)
- Step 3: 39.5 (#144)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1314 | 1367 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)
- Step 3: 27.6 (#102)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1299 | 1355 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |

## Math

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)
- Step 3: 34.9 (#148)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1298 | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)
- Step 3: 36.2 (#161)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1289 | 1333 |

## Multimodal

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
- Step 3: 34.9 (#81)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1176 |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)
- Step 3: 46.5 (#154)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1314 | 1396 |
| LMArena German | 1231 | 1371 |
| LMArena Russian | 1271 | 1331 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1207 | — |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1271 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1372 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)
- Step 3: 70.6 (#159)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1332 |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)
- Step 3: 40.3 (#152)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1292 | 1326 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)
- Step 3: 54.5 (#146)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1299 | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1262 | 1322 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1299 | 1340 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 or Step 3 better for coding?

Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and Step 3 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.