# Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 vs Qwen3.6 Plus

> Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-plus-vs-qwen3-6-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 56.1 to 34.9.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.1 | 47.3 |
| Rank | 179 | 54 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $3 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.6 (#125)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1314 | 1467 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1461 |
| SciCode | — | 40.7% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 670.15 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 28.5 (#89)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1299 | 1449 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.3% |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| DTBench | — | 81.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.67 |

## Math

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 50.6 (#44)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1298 | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 38.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 8.3% |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#40)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1289 | 1456 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 44.1% |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1314 | 1478 |
| LMArena German | 1231 | 1451 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1207 | 1389 |
| LMArena Russian | 1271 | 1434 |
| LMArena French | — | 1454 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1381 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.2 (#70)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1425 |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.1 (#48)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1292 | 1440 |
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1299 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1262 | 1405 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1299 | 1438 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.