# Qwen2.5-Max vs Wizardlm 70b

> Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.7 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-max-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5-Max scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5-Max leads 55.4 to 34.8.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5-Max | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 40.7 | 33.0 |
| Rank | 146 | 249 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)
- Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | 1081 |
| LiveBench Coding | 64.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)
- Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1360 | 1079 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 51.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 67.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 132.53 | — |
| LiveBench | 62.3% | — |

## Math

- Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)
- Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1369 | 1116 |
| LiveBench Math | 58.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | 21.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1337 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1352 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1382 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1350 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1353 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1300 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1377 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1335 | 1093 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 75.3% | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1097 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1367 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1108 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 72.9% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 56.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5-Max better than Wizardlm 70b?

Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.7 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen2.5-Max or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Qwen2.5-Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-Max and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5-Max has 27 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.