# Qwen2.5-Max vs Qwen3 Max

> Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-max-vs-qwen3-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5-Max scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Max in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 Max leads 48.1 to 35.3.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.7 | 43.7 |
| Rank | 146 | 87 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.8 (#117)
- Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | 1456 |
| LiveBench Coding | 64.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen2.5-Max: —
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5-Max: 25.6 (#147)
- Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1360 | 1448 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 132.53 | 142.38 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 51.4% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 67.9% | — |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |
| LiveBench | 62.3% | — |

## Math

- Qwen2.5-Max: 36.9 (#162)
- Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1369 | 1446 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench Math | 58.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5-Max: 35.3 (#186)
- Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1337 | 1455 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |
| Confabulations | 21.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5-Max: 48.1 (#146)
- Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1352 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1382 | 1478 |
| LMArena French | 1396 | 1449 |
| LMArena German | 1350 | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1300 | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | 1304 | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | 1353 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1377 | 1462 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5-Max: 71.3 (#152)
- Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1335 | 1419 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 75.3% | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.4 (#142)
- Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1438 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5-Max: 55.4 (#146)
- Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1367 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1446 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 72.9% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 56.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5-Max better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 40.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen2.5-Max or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-Max and Qwen3 Max share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5-Max has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.