# Qwen2.5-Max vs Qwen3.5 Plus

> Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-max-vs-qwen3-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen2.5-Max scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 47.9 to 34.3.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.1 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 142 | 103 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.2 (#118)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 64.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen2.5-Max: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5-Max: 24.6 (#144)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 132.54 | 146.79 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 51.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1360 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 67.9% | — |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| LiveBench | 62.3% | — |

## Math

- Qwen2.5-Max: 34.3 (#162)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LiveBench Math | 58.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1369 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5-Max: 34.8 (#181)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Confabulations | 21.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1337 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5-Max: 48.3 (#140)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1352 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena French | 1396 | — |
| LMArena German | 1350 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1299 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1377 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5-Max: 71.5 (#147)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 75.3% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1335 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.3 (#137)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5-Max: 55.6 (#141)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1367 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 72.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 56.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5-Max better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 40.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-Max and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen2.5-Max has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.