# Qwen2.5-Max vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-max-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5-Max scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen2.5-Max leads 48.3 to 42.1.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.1 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 142 | 179 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.2 (#118)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | 1314 |
| LiveBench Coding | 64.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5-Max: 24.6 (#144)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1360 | 1299 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 51.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 67.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 132.54 | — |
| LiveBench | 62.3% | — |

## Math

- Qwen2.5-Max: 34.3 (#162)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1369 | 1298 |
| LiveBench Math | 58.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5-Max: 34.8 (#181)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1337 | 1289 |
| Confabulations | 21.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5-Max: 48.3 (#140)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1352 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1382 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1350 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1299 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1353 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1377 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5-Max: 71.5 (#147)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1335 | 1275 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 75.3% | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.3 (#137)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5-Max: 55.6 (#141)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Max | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1367 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1339 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1364 | 1299 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 72.9% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 56.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5-Max better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen2.5-Max or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5-Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.2 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-Max and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5-Max has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.