# Qwen2.5-Coder-32B vs Wizardlm 70b

> Qwen2.5-Coder-32B and Wizardlm 70b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.4 vs 33.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-coder-32b-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Wizardlm 70b leads 31.4 to 22.6.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 33.0 |
| Rank | 245 | 249 |
| Context | 33K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.66 | — |
| Output $/M | $1 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)
- Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1276 | 1081 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 16.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 49% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 56.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 87.2% | — |
| MBPP+ | 77% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)
- Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | 1079 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 42.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 49.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.49 | — |
| HellaSwag | 83% | — |
| LiveBench | 46.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.8% | — |

## Math

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)
- Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1116 |
| LiveBench Math | 46.6% | — |
| GSM8K | 93% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1221 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 70.5% | — |
| MMLU | 79.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1205 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1222 | 1052 |
| LMArena Russian | 1228 | 1155 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1223 | 1093 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.7% | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1251 | 1097 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1230 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1174 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1222 | 1108 |
| LiveBench Language | 23.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better than Wizardlm 70b?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B and Wizardlm 70b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.4 vs 33.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Qwen2.5-Coder-32B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Wizardlm 70b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.4 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-Coder-32B and Wizardlm 70b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.