# Qwen2.5-Coder-32B vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

> Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen2-5-coder-32b-vs-step-2-16k-exp-202412
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B scores higher in 0 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 38.5 to 22.6.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 39.2 |
| Rank | 245 | 171 |
| Context | 33K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.66 | — |
| Output $/M | $1 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1276 | 1316 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 16.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 49% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 56.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 87.2% | — |
| MBPP+ | 77% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | 1299 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 42.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 49.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.49 | — |
| HellaSwag | 83% | — |
| LiveBench | 46.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.8% | — |

## Math

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1304 |
| LiveBench Math | 46.6% | — |
| GSM8K | 93% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1221 | 1279 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 70.5% | — |
| MMLU | 79.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1205 | 1290 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1222 | 1331 |
| LMArena Russian | 1228 | 1324 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1223 | 1287 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.7% | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1251 | 1307 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)
- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1230 | 1321 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1174 | 1328 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1222 | 1292 |
| LiveBench Language | 23.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen2.5-Coder-32B or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-Coder-32B and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.